data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6fa1e/6fa1e0ae7f70f2ada29bc46e89f93df6c8b16993" alt=""
The choice of John McCain to name Sarah Palin as his Vice-Presidential running mate was both stunning and politically brilliant. While the left wing is still dazed over the thought that perhaps he was choosing her to win over the Hillary Clinton supporters, my guess is that he actually chose her to prevail among the right wing camp; particularly, the right wing, conservative, evangelical camp. And triumph he did.
While prior to the Palin choice, I could get away with not supporting the Republican ticket among Christian social conservatives, I no longer have that luxury. I have been inundated with pro-Palin messages via email, facebook, etc. as if she were the Republican candidate for President of the U.S. all of which carry the message that if I don't vote for McCain-Palin, then I'm lined up with a Muslim terrorist who wants to kill my babies and eat them on national t.v.
What is so disturbing to me about this (besides the obvious absurdity) is that it seems to blindly follow partisan politics. Very few and far between are conservative evangelicals who even raise the question of the appropriateness of this choice. In fact, the first public statement I have seen on the issue was raised in an
LA Times article just over a week ago.
Here's the point of contention: Is it really a God-centered, biblical family value to support a woman who has a teenager with a "crisis" pregnancy, a baby with Downs-Syndrome and two other daughters living at home, to neglect her role as wife and mother to advance a political career? And without a doubt, if she is going to effectively execute the office of Vice-President of the U.S., she will most certainly neglect the precious gift of being Mom. Perhaps we're seeing a little of that fruit in Bristol (Palin's 17 year-old, pregnant daughter) already at the governor level.
Men whom I greatly admire for their stance on the biblical, complementarian role of men and women have suggested that we compartmentalize and advocate that such roles are good for the church and the home, but that politics is a separate arena. I couldn't disagree more. Just as she cannot incise her home life from her political life, we cannot either. Perhaps Palin could offer glorious public service as Vice-President, but not during this season in her life.
Scripture unequivocally places family relationship as the priority. I am not raising the question due to a chauvinistic belief that women cannot work outside of the home, since Prov. 31 states that the virtuous woman does, in fact, work outside the home, but not at every season. And we are beholding a woman who is making political advancement a priority over her family, which according to Paul "has denied the faith and is worst than an unbeliever" (I Tim. 5:8).
I must caveat this with the fact that I'm not pushing a pro-Obama standpoint as there is much to his political agenda with which I prayerfully struggle. I simply ask, are we blinded more by a cultural expectation to vote Republican, no matter how unbiblical the choice or do we think more creatively (like third party write-ins). Wish I had more answers, but we're in a season where we should be asking tougher questions.
I post this with hesitation as I'm unsure of the willingness of evangelical Christians to dialogue...